Countdown header img desk

MAI SUNT 00:00:00:00

MAI SUNT

X

Countdown header img  mob

MAI SUNT 00:00:00:00

MAI SUNT

X

Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene: On Science, Belief, and the Humanities

De (autor): Barbara Herrnstein Smith

Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene: On Science, Belief, and the Humanities - Barbara Herrnstein Smith

Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene: On Science, Belief, and the Humanities

De (autor): Barbara Herrnstein Smith

In Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene, Barbara Herrnstein Smith addresses a set of contemporary issues involving knowledge and science from a constructivist-pragmatist perspective often labeled "relativism." Practicing that relativism, she argues, does not mean refusing judgment or asserting absurdities but being conscious of the existence and significance of contingency, complexity, and multiplicity. Rejecting classic and neorealist views of knowledge and human cognition, Smith describes important alternative accounts in cognitive theory, science studies, and contemporary philosophy of mind. The "relativism" commonly associated with these alternative accounts, she maintains, is a chimera--part straw man, part red herring. Objections to the position so named typically involve crucially improper paraphrase of empirical observations of variability and contingency or dismaying inferences improperly drawn from such observations. In an extended examination of recent writings by Bruno Latour, Smith indicates the increasing centrality of theological investments in his work and both the interest of those writings but also their limits for humanities scholars seeking to appropriate them. Discussing computational methods in literary studies, she describes how the idea of "close reading" has operated historically in the Anglo-American literary academy and how it figures now in the discourses of the digital humanities. Efforts to make the aims and methods of the humanities more scientific, she suggests, typically involve ill-informed or otherwise dubious conceptions of science. What distinguishes the humanities and the natural sciences, she argues, are neither subject areas nor methods as such but fundamental epistemic orientations. Declining calls to reaffirm or rehabilitate philosophical realism in the face of denials of climate change, Smith maintains that the most illuminating perspectives for conceptualization and practice in the Anthropocene are precisely those labeled, but commonly mischaracterized as, "relativist."

Citește mai mult

-10%

transport gratuit

PRP: 165.33 Lei

!

Acesta este Prețul Recomandat de Producător. Prețul de vânzare al produsului este afișat mai jos.

148.80Lei

148.80Lei

165.33 Lei

Primești 148 puncte

Important icon msg

Primești puncte de fidelitate după fiecare comandă! 100 puncte de fidelitate reprezintă 1 leu. Folosește-le la viitoarele achiziții!

Livrare in 2-4 saptamani

Plasează rapid comanda

Important icon msg

Poți comanda acest produs introducând numărul tău de telefon. În cel mai scurt timp vei fi apelat de un operator Libris pentru preluarea datelor necesare.

Completează mai jos numărul tău de telefon

Descrierea produsului

In Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene, Barbara Herrnstein Smith addresses a set of contemporary issues involving knowledge and science from a constructivist-pragmatist perspective often labeled "relativism." Practicing that relativism, she argues, does not mean refusing judgment or asserting absurdities but being conscious of the existence and significance of contingency, complexity, and multiplicity. Rejecting classic and neorealist views of knowledge and human cognition, Smith describes important alternative accounts in cognitive theory, science studies, and contemporary philosophy of mind. The "relativism" commonly associated with these alternative accounts, she maintains, is a chimera--part straw man, part red herring. Objections to the position so named typically involve crucially improper paraphrase of empirical observations of variability and contingency or dismaying inferences improperly drawn from such observations. In an extended examination of recent writings by Bruno Latour, Smith indicates the increasing centrality of theological investments in his work and both the interest of those writings but also their limits for humanities scholars seeking to appropriate them. Discussing computational methods in literary studies, she describes how the idea of "close reading" has operated historically in the Anglo-American literary academy and how it figures now in the discourses of the digital humanities. Efforts to make the aims and methods of the humanities more scientific, she suggests, typically involve ill-informed or otherwise dubious conceptions of science. What distinguishes the humanities and the natural sciences, she argues, are neither subject areas nor methods as such but fundamental epistemic orientations. Declining calls to reaffirm or rehabilitate philosophical realism in the face of denials of climate change, Smith maintains that the most illuminating perspectives for conceptualization and practice in the Anthropocene are precisely those labeled, but commonly mischaracterized as, "relativist."

Citește mai mult

S-ar putea să-ți placă și

De același autor

Părerea ta e inspirație pentru comunitatea Libris!

Istoricul tău de navigare

Acum se comandă

Noi suntem despre cărți, și la fel este și

Newsletter-ul nostru.

Abonează-te la veștile literare și primești un cupon de -10% pentru viitoarea ta comandă!

*Reducerea aplicată prin cupon nu se cumulează, ci se aplică reducerea cea mai mare.

Mă abonez image one
Mă abonez image one
Accessibility Logo

Salut! Te pot ajuta?

X