The Lost Ancient Nativity. Deep in the Vatican archives, a treasure was recently discovered. A document purporting to be written by the Magi themselves has surfaced in recent years. You likely have not even heard about this, even though the translator published his work in 2010, while defining a valid chain of custody with references to this work, before the fifth century, perhaps as far back as the second. The find has been all but silenced, as it demonstrates the Vatican knew the Wise Men were holy, sagacious Kings (yes, Kings!). They originated in the Far East, beyond India from the Land of the Garden of Eden, and never Persia, Arabia, nor modern India. In the first century, this Revelation of the Magi also documents the Apostle Thomas, in traveling as far as India, made it to this same Land of the Three Kings, in their words. India, in the ancient perspective, embodied an area including the Philippine Indies. Instead, the Pope has held to the erroneous legends they manufactured in the sixth century. This discovery proves the Vatican knew their new legend was wrong, yet continued to propagate a false Christmas story that even permeates the Protestant Church. Of course, it was the Catholic Church who also changed their Bibles altering this passage from David to read differently than it does, and their own document proves this. That deception hides the actual land that connects with this account as the Isles of Gold - Ophir, Sheba and Tarshish. Perhaps the Vatican does not want us to know this land is prophesied to rise in the last days against this exact type of corrupt theology from the Catholic Church. However, over the years, the entire narrative proves to have been embellished greatly by both Protestant and Catholic scholars, who neither seem to have ever read the Bible story, but instead, blindly follow their illiterate tradition. They have become the "blind leading the blind" (Matt. 15:14), whether knowingly or not. Scholars have changed practically every element of the Christmas story, for that matter, as if the Bible account of the birth of our Savior is not enough unto itself. Some will even admit the details, such as the season are erroneous but, in negligence, they do nothing to correct it. These accuse Luke of erring when they are the ones who seem challenged to read basic sentences. Luke skillfully preserved the data, as you will observe, the account specifies the date of Jesus' (Yahusha's) birth, which was not on nor near December 25th. It